Amazon.com Widgets Go Becky < The presidential candidates on the UN Convention on Gimps

GoBecky .net

The presidential candidates on the UN Convention on Gimps

A little over a week ago I wrote about the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities hitting its critical mass of ratifications thanks to Ecuador. The US is currently (shamefully) not even a signatory to the convention, much less a ratifying member. If disability rights issues are important to you, then you might wonder, as I did, what the presidential candidates' positions are on ratification.

So I dug up the questionnaire sent to the candidates of both parties by the American Association of People with Disabilities. You can view the full questionnaire with side-by-side comparisons of responses at the AAPD's 2008 Presidential Election Action Center. Here's the salient bit about the UN convention:

Do you support U.S. ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocal?

Obama: Yes. I believe that the rights of the estimated 650 million individuals with disabilities worldwide must be protected. I support the United States' ratification of this important measure.

Clinton: I embrace the values that animate the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. I believe the Convention was undertaken with the same goals that the United States had in enacting the ADA – namely, the goals of empowering individuals with disabilities and integrating these individuals into all aspects of society. Given the virtuous goals embedded within the Convention, I would champion these principles as President.

McCain: [crickets chirping]

McCain has not yet answered the questionnaire, so I don't know if he has a stated position on this issue. (Although McCain doesn't seem to know McCain's positions on some things, so who knows.) Obama gives a clear, unqualified "yes" - indeed, ratification of the convention is the first thing Obama mentions in his video about his proposed policies on disability rights. And Clinton sounds, as usual, like Charlie Brown's teacher - she "values... the virtuous goals" of the Convention, and promises to champion said goals, but she never actually says whether she'd support ratification of the convention itself.